17 Apr 2007
KO AND JONG AND ANOR V YANG AND ANOR HC AK CIV 2006-404-3283
- Citation
- openlaw-2fc0478b_cd6c_4d26_bae2_2596a12538d9.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Summary judgment was refused because plaintiffs failed to establish as a matter of law that defendants had no reasonably arguable defence: there were contested factual issues about whether an oral agreement to mortgage existed or was enforceable by part performance, whether the solicitors had reasonable grounds to lodge the caveat, and whether causation and quantum could be separated from liability, all requiring trial determination.