29 May 2012
VEGAR-FITZGERALD V NOYCE AND MAWDSLEY HC AK CIV-2012-404-1683
- Citation
- openlaw-d39cb729_3385_43b8_807d_108669a96db2.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Because the applicant demonstrated an arguable case, supported by loan agreements, ledgers and bank records, that Matakana Estate Ltd remained indebted to her and therefore had not performed all obligations under the security agreement, the Court (applying a summary‑procedure standard) ordered that the financing statement be maintained under s167 pending further interlocutory resolution; the Court did not finally determine substantive rights or rectification issues.