18 Jun 2015
SJ V PJ CA58/2015 [2015] NZCA 258
- Citation
- [2015] NZCA 258
- Court
- Court of Appeal
Leave to appeal under s 67 was declined for both parties because the proposed second appeals did not meet the threshold of raising questions capable of bona fide and serious argument of sufficient importance to justify further appeal; one procedural amendment was made to the leave question (adding "for super profits" to question (f)); additional grounds advanced by SJ and PJ were rejected as either settled by precedent, matters that should have been raised earlier and put to experts, or unacceptably prolonging the appeal. The High Court decision was not to be read as holding that only s 18A m…