3 Nov 2010
JOHN APPLETON AND ANOR V TAURANGA LAW HC TAU CIV-2010-070-385
- Citation
- openlaw-f55ce429_91b5_40d8_af34_df84f2c98ee1.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Summary judgment is dismissed because there is a triable issue whether the defendant assumed a duty of care upon receipt of the documents (given familiarity with Blue Chip and referral relationship) and whether failing to advise of the s 225 RMA cancellation within the statutory 14 days amounted to breach; those issues require full hearing of evidence.