21 Oct 2019
BODY CORPORATE 202692 v AUCKLAND COUNCIL [2019] NZHC [2696]
- Citation
- BODY CORPORATE 202692 v AUCKLAND COUNCIL [2019] NZHC [2696]
- Court
- High Court
Leave to appeal and an adjournment were refused. The balance of convenience favoured proceeding to the substantive hearing because plaintiffs faced significant financial prejudice and the interlocutory appeal risked being overtaken or rendered academic by trial findings; defendants retain the right to appeal limitation issues after final judgment and may seek costs if vindicated.