5 Oct 1998
Warwood v Accident Rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation
- Citation
- [1998] NZACC 216
- Court
- District Court
On the balance of probabilities the medical evidence taken as a whole established that the appellant's employment task had a particular repetitive and postural characteristic which caused or materially contributed to her injury, that this characteristic was not present to any material extent in non‑employment activities, and that the risk was significantly greater for persons performing that task in that environment; therefore s7(1)(a)–(c) are satisfied and the appellant is entitled to cover.