2 Aug 2013
PROTECT PAUANUI INC v THE THAMES COROMANDEL DISTRICT Council & ANOR [2013] NZHC 1944
- Citation
- [2013] NZHC 1944
- Court
- High Court
The application is dismissed because (1) the alleged defects relate to procedural matters governed by Schedule 1 and are conclusively presumed to have been complied with by virtue of s 83 RMA absent a timely s 316(3) enforcement application, (2) the Council did not make a reviewable error in notification or in accepting the Club's submission, and (3) allegations of bias are not established; alternatively relief would be refused for inordinate delay and prejudice to the Club.