25 Jun 2009
B L HAZELL V INSTANT FINANCE LTD & ORS HC AK CIV 2009-404-001280
- Citation
- openlaw-e6fa8ddf_5783_4a25_8475_84ccc8f7604d.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The proposal could not be approved because there was no evidence that the debtor, having had her vehicle seized and sold by a secured creditor, remained able to comply with the proposal condition requiring continued employment; absence of this material evidence warranted adjournment for further evidence.