26 Nov 2008
DILIP-KUMAR RUPA & ORS V BANK OF NEW ZEALAND CA CA76/2008
- Citation
- openlaw-1e8a8627_ccca_401b_b86d_f8ceaddc62f0.pdf
- Court
- Court of Appeal
The Associate Judge properly granted summary judgment because the appellants' core allegations (notably securitisation and statutory disclosure breaches) were unsupported and flatly denied by credible bank evidence; the 13 July 2006 document did not amount to a s19 request under the Credit Contracts Act; there was no procedural unfairness; accordingly the appeal lacked merit and is dismissed, with costs awarded to the bank on the standard band A basis.