25 May 2012
BLACK V GILTECH PRECISION CASTINGS (2004) LIMITED HC DUN CIV-2010-412-000105
- Citation
- openlaw-3b51dca2_585b_4c87_ac2c_306c621d210f.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The Court found on the balance of probabilities that the plaintiff had agreed to the five‑year requirement and the terms recorded in Schedule 6; the drafts recorded that agreement; the defendants acted in accordance with that binding agreement (and estoppel); their conduct was not oppressive under s174; all causes of action failed and judgment was entered for the defendants.