25 Feb 2011
BUSHETTS TRANSPORT LIMITED v GRAHAM ROGER LOWES AND TONY IAN LOWES HC WN CIV 2011-485-131
- Citation
- openlaw-bfe312f5_6efa_4766_9f64_0994811c18df.pdf
- Court
- High Court
On the strength of the uncontroverted and circumstantial evidence there was a strongly arguable case that the Lowes and Foot used BTL information and depot as a springboard and that CHB benefited; full prohibition on CHB trading was refused because Foot agreed to transfer her shares and cease employment with CHB within 14 days, but a limited interim restraint was granted preventing the second to fourth defendants from directly or indirectly soliciting named BTL clients (those BTL serviced in the last 12 months) identified on an Empower-derived list to be provided by the plaintiffs, effective…