27 Nov 2017
Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant sought re‑litigation of factual findings specific to the case, no issue of general or public importance was identified, and there was no risk of miscarriage of justice if leave was refused.
6 Dec 2010
Fitzherbert Rowe were validly instructed by Davis O'Sullivan on behalf of Aviation Property; the invoice of $25,097.22 was reasonable given the urgency and complexity; the terms of engagement containing 16% p.a. compounding interest were valid and applicable after parties were warned and did not secure payment by the concession date; accordingly Fitzherbert Rowe are entitled to the principal and accrued compounding interest and payment must be made from Aviation Property funds with $5,000 plus GST retained for future settlement costs.