23 Oct 2018
PATEL v RAJJO NOMINEES LIMITED [2018] NZHC 2746
- Citation
- [2018] NZHC 2746
- Court
- High Court
Because the trustees had paid the full judgment debt, the balance of justice required removal of caveats and discharge of charging orders over their properties; the potential disadvantage to the defendant from the s 148 prohibition did not outweigh the trustees' right to deal with their property. The second defendant should be struck out because he was improperly cited, and costs are limited to recovery of plaintiffs' disbursements against the first defendant with no costs to the solicitor representing himself.