8 Oct 2008
APD PROPERTY DEVELOPMENTS LIMITED V BARREA GROUP LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION) HC AK CIV 2008-404-000508
- Citation
- openlaw-0d467351_0f26_4047_a655_f5e98ff82155.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Adjournment refused because applicant had two prior opportunities and clear timetabling to present the evidence, failed to provide an adequate evidential explanation for delay (unsupported burglary claim and late change of accountant), and the additional material sought would constitute reply to reply rather than new primary evidence; therefore no justification for adjournment existed and the application could proceed without it.