15 Nov 2006
TAUERU LIME LIMITED V PAUL THOMAS STILES AND PRUDENCE MARGARET HAMILL HC WN CIV-2006-435-151
- Citation
- openlaw-78eeb521_df8f_42ca_98ad_f39405528406.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The court refused the respondents' application for special leave under r508(3) and ruled that the respondents' affidavits are not to be read or used as evidence because the deponents failed to attend for cross-examination after valid notice; cross-examination in caveat proceedings is permitted under r508 and r458M and absent justification the sanction in r508(3) applies.