5 Jul 2016
AUGUSTINE LAU v UMH GROUP LIMITED [2016] NZSC 82
- Citation
- [2016] NZSC 82
- Court
- Supreme Court
The application for leave to appeal was dismissed because the proposed appeal raised no matter of public importance and did not disclose a real risk of miscarriage of justice; the Court of Appeal correctly refused an extension of time because the intended appeal could not succeed and the applicant failed to establish proper standing or a sufficient explanation for delay.