8 Oct 2004
Catley v Accident Compensation Corporation
- Citation
- [2004] NZACC 323
- Court
- District Court
The appellant failed to identify a specific personal injury and to prove the three statutory elements of s30 on the balance of probabilities; the occupational medicine report found no physical injury or occupational causal link and the rheumatologist’s opinion did not specify the s30 property/characteristic or demonstrate a significantly greater risk, therefore cover under s30 is not established.