16 May 2008
QUESTNET LTD V LANE HC AK CIV 2007-404-5827
- Citation
- openlaw-c73a97c2_9fb9_411f_8245_9ea2130e5f7d.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The Court held s 6(1)(c) requires notice of the proceedings generally rather than notice of the specific interlocutory hearing; Mr Lane had actual and sufficient notice and elected not to take procedural steps, so registration could not be set aside under s 6(1)(c) or s 6(1)(e); the public policy exception did not apply because there was no breach of fundamental justice; s 7 discretion was declined because the pending appeal and previous unsuccessful applications did not justify setting aside or adjourning registration.