13 Dec 2007
JOHN GARDINER CHAMBERS V DISPUTES TRIBUNAL RANGIORA REGISTRY HC CHCH CIV 2006-409-000832
- Citation
- openlaw-e551a74d_94fb_4c10_8143_e25dd77185bb.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The High Court held that the applicant failed to establish procedural unfairness, that the referee's factual findings resolving conflicting evidence were not irrational in the Wednesbury sense, that the proximate cause on the evidence was the October 2004 saturation (not pre-existing wear), and that the Consumer Guarantees Act remedy opportunity had been afforded; accordingly judicial review was dismissed and the Tribunal order enforced.