7 Jun 2011
WATERHOUSE V CONTRACTORS BONDING LIMITED HC AK CIV-2010-404-3074
- Citation
- openlaw-034d015a_4e02_40c2_9447_1cdb9137a4a3.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The litigation funding agreement was to be produced to the Court for perusal but not disclosed to the defendant; there was no proper basis to permit the defendant to see it; the defendant failed in its application to remove the proceeding from the Commercial List and plaintiffs are awarded 50% of their Category 2B costs ($2,914) for that aspect; costs on the funding disclosure and other aspects of the first judgment lie where they fall; in respect of the second judgment costs lie where they fall because parties had roughly equal success and the plaintiffs' offer of $50,000 security for costs…