20 Sept 2019
PARRY v PARRY [2019] NZHC 2388
- Citation
- [2019] NZHC 2388
- Court
- High Court
The notice was removed because the applicant failed to establish an arguable proprietary interest in Mahana Rd: the written agreement created only contractual rights and not a proprietary interest in the property; ss 44 and 44C were inapplicable; the applicant's alleged indirect contributions to the childcare business did not constitute qualifying contributions nor a reasonable expectation of an interest in property acquired by the respondent post-separation.