11 Aug 2016
KAUR v THE MINISTRY OF BUSINESS, INNOVATION AND EMPLOYMENT [2016] NZHC 1862
- Citation
- [2016] NZHC 1862
- Court
- High Court
Award costs 2B to respondents for the first interlocutory application (effectively withdrawn/subsumed) and award costs 2B to applicant for the second interlocutory application because the applicant obtained the substantive concession rendering cross-examination necessary on a limited ground; no uplift or indemnity costs awarded and no costs on costs, because respondent conduct and timetable confusion mitigated any discretionary increase.