23 Mar 2017
ERICSON v NEW ZEALAND PAROLE BOARD [2017] NZHC 536
- Citation
- [2017] NZHC 536
- Court
- High Court
The Board did not err in law: it was aware of and considered its power to impose special conditions and, on the material before it, reasonably concluded there remained an undue risk because of the short duration of supported accommodation, concerns about completion of necessary psychological treatment and the potential severity of future violence; the decision to decline parole was within the range of reasonable outcomes and not disproportionate.