8 Dec 2011
DANNI MU V BODY CORPORATE 312421 HC AK CIV-2011-404-4768
- Citation
- openlaw-e79a3b3d_8f41_45db_8119_bfe0f8b878d9.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The judge concluded the evidence indicated defiance/unwillingness to pay rather than an inability to pay and that the plaintiff, resident in New Zealand with significant prior investment in the unit, was not shown to meet the r 5.45(1)(b) threshold; accordingly security for costs was not justified and the application was dismissed.