8 Jun 2018
ENOKA v R [2018] NZCA 185
- Citation
- [2018] NZCA 185
- Court
- Court of Appeal
The Court held the totality adjustment made by the High Court was within range but the uplift of 18 months for previous convictions was excessive and was reduced to 12 months; the global discount for mitigation was inadequate because substantial, costly assistance warranted a larger reduction; applying a 40% personal mitigation discount and reducing the uplift produced an aggregate sentence reduction, requiring quashing and substitution of the specified sentences for aggravated burglary, wounding with intent and unlawful detainment while confirming concurrent sentences for the rest.