28 Jun 2017
Farrimond v Farrimond [2017] NZHC 1450
- Citation
- [2017] NZFLR 768
- Court
- High Court
Applying s 2H and the Evers v Evers holistic test, the court surveyed the substantial pattern of use of the Glenfield property up to separation and found its use as the family home had not been 'spent' by the time of separation; accordingly Glenfield remained the family home and was relationship property, so the Manly rental could not be classified as the family home.