31 Mar 2008
RIDDIFORD AND ANOR V HER MAJESTY'S ATTORNEY GENERAL HC WN CIV 2006-485-833
- Citation
- openlaw-5f79196c_0576_4e6f_af5c_47a9099a6b40.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The court applied r716 and the established tests of freshness, credibility and cogency and concluded the evidence sought (2006 sales, Quotable Value letter, alleged Deed breaches, costs) failed the cogency/freshness tests or was peripheral/hearsay; accordingly leave to adduce further evidence was refused; inspection is left to the presiding judge and costs evidence is premature.