27 Feb 2019
CARROLL CIVIL LIMITED v TEXCO DRILLING AND PILING LIMITED [2019] NZHC 260
- Citation
- [2019] NZHC 260
- Court
- High Court
Because there was no written acceptance or incorporation of the drilling quotation into the subcontract and the subcontract required written variations, a genuine and substantial dispute existed as to whether Carroll owed the claimed debt; accordingly the statutory demand was set aside under s 290(4)(a).