30 Sept 2019
FARR v KNOWLES [2019] NZHC 2474
- Citation
- [2019] NZHC 2474
- Court
- High Court
The appeal succeeds because the appellant raised a tenable defence that the Shareholding Agreement, when read with the contemporaneous emails, may have subsumed or discharged the earlier personal loan agreements and the newly admitted email evidence provided special reasons for its admission; the factual and contractual issues require full factual testing and therefore the matter was unsuitable for summary judgment and must be remitted for a full hearing.