21 Nov 2011
JOANNE MARY MANNING V TIMOTHY TERENCE MANNING HC AK CIV 2011-404-004660
- Citation
- openlaw-705f6b6b_814f_42bb_9fd1_c77379aea95f.pdf
- Court
- High Court
The variation agreement is ambiguous as to whether the $200,000 obligation was extinguished; because the agreement does not contain a clear expression preserving the debt, summary judgment on the debt and interest cannot be granted; however the net sale proceeds held in trust are payable to the plaintiff and judgment for those proceeds is ordered.