17 Apr 2014
P-ONEFIVE INVESTMENTS LIMITED v AUCKLAND COUNCIL [2014] NZHC 825
- Citation
- [2014] NZHC 825
- Court
- High Court
Summary judgment was refused because factual disputes existed as to accrual of loss and whether later-discovered latent defects gave rise to new causes of action; volenti and reliance issues required factual resolution; however claims premised on assignment from Staccato were either ineffective or time-barred and were struck out (assignment deed ineffective as of 2012 and notice given outside Building Act long stop and Limitation Act periods).