12 Apr 2017
AN (SC 24/2017) v BUPA CARE SERVICES (NEW ZEALAND) LIMITED [2017] NZSC 49
- Citation
- [2017] NZFLR 194
- Court
- Supreme Court
Leave to appeal was dismissed because no exceptional circumstances justified a direct appeal to this Court, there was no material before the Court challenging the legality of the applicant's detention, and more appropriate remedies exist (appeal under the PPPR Act, review, or judicial review); further, ongoing name suppression is required under s80 PPPR Act and ss11B–11D Family Court Act 1980.