2 Jul 2021
The recall and suppression applications were dismissed because the applicant did not identify any new legislation or binding authority or any other very special reason to justify recall; the applications formed part of serial abusive litigation and the presumption of open justice was not rebutted, and there was no extant proceeding as the filing fee remained unpaid.
21 Mar 2019
The Deputy Registrar's refusal to waive the filing fees was upheld because the applicant failed to show the proposed appeal or underlying proceedings involved a genuine matter of public interest sufficient to meet the regulatory criteria and the application was effectively futile given unpaid fees/security and procedural defects; accordingly the review application was dismissed.
28 Apr 2017
Because the plaintiff was entitled to reasonable disbursements and the parties agreed the amounts, the Court ordered the defendant to pay disbursements of $3,507.10 and noted filing fees were waived.
27 Jul 2010
The appeals were struck out because the appellant declined to pay court‑fixed security and filing fees, took no steps to advance the appeals, did not seek review of the Registrar's refusals, and the underlying High Court proceedings had no real prospect of success (justifying strike out and indemnity costs).