4 Apr 2012
CHILD POVERTY ACTION GROUP INCORPORATED V THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL HC WN CIV-2009-404-273
- Citation
- openlaw-76ab5c32_1d45_42b5_b019_490186482ae6.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Leave to appeal was dismissed because, although questions of law on the scope of s19 were capable of appellate consideration, there was no utility in granting leave: any discrimination found would, on the High Court's analysis, be demonstrably justified under s5 BORA and there was no seriously arguable basis that s5 would yield a different outcome; accordingly no sufficiently useful or consequential relief was likely and leave must be refused.