11 Mar 2013
Leave to appeal was granted to determine whether the trial judge erred by failing to direct the jury as to withdrawal under s 66(1)(b) of the Crimes Act 1961; the Court approved that specific question for appeal.
19 Jan 2010
The appeal is reinstated because the appellant likely did not intend the email to effect a legal withdrawal, he had filed full submissions, and the respondent does not oppose reinstatement; therefore fairness requires reinstatement and the court will set a fresh timetable and refer the matter for determination on the papers.
16 Sept 2008
The Court found that the withdrawal notation was made in error due to a misunderstanding and, exercising its discretion, reinstated the appeal because it was never intended to be withdrawn and the respondent did not oppose reinstatement.
20 Nov 2006
The court accepted the appellant's request and formally recorded the appeal as withdrawn, thereby terminating the proceedings.
24 Oct 2006
The appeal was withdrawn by the appellant and the court ordered that the respondent pay costs of $250 inclusive of disbursements to the appellant.
25 Sept 2006
The appeal is withdrawn at the request of counsel for the appellant.
9 Jul 2004
The court accepted the appellant's application to withdraw the appeal and accordingly struck the appeal out.
11 Dec 1997
The appeal is dismissed because the appellant failed to comply with the Registrar’s direction to file submissions within the time given and failed to provide the requested written notice of withdrawal despite being advised to do so, justifying dismissal for want of prosecution.