3 Dec 2009
HUGHES V WILLIAMS HC AK CIV-2009-404-7443
- Citation
- openlaw-4ad3a89b_fe19_4ca6_a847_b3d8c214fe0d.pdf
- Court
- High Court
Although there was material non‑disclosure by the respondent about prior knowledge of the proposed sale and the administrator's acknowledgment of obligations, the Court preferred the more liberal approach to without‑notice reviews and found the respondent did not have a realistic prospect of obtaining the whole estate or whole property; on balance of convenience sale of the property with proceeds held in an interest‑bearing account was preferable. The interim injunction was discharged and wasted costs of $2,062.50 were ordered payable by the respondent; further damage and costs questions were…