CRYSTAL INDUSTRIES Ltd N’ABANDI v. BPR Plc

CRYSTAL INDUSTRIES Ltd N’ABANDI v. BPR Plc

The Court of Appeal found that both lower courts decided against the appellants on the same essential ground—failure to comply with the loan agreement—regardless of the number or nature of issues considered. Therefore, the second appeal is inadmissible under Article 52(3) of Law No 30/2018. The appellants and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RCOMAA00099/2022/CA
Parties
Appellant: Crystal Industries Ltd; Appellant: Kamanzi Charles; Appellant: Mbabazi Enid; Respondent: Banque Populaire du Rwanda Plc (BPR Plc)
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
20 September 2024
Case Number
RCOMAA00099/2022/CA
Procedural Posture
Commercial Appeal / Second Appeal (court of Appeal)
Outcome
Second appeal dismissed as inadmissible for lack of jurisdiction; costs awarded to respondent.
Legal Topics
Appellate Jurisdiction, Loan Agreements, Surety Liability, Procedural Bars, Costs and Attorney Fees
Source Language
rw
Commercial Law Banking Law Civil Procedure Appellate Jurisdiction Loan Agreements Surety Liability Procedural Bars Costs and Attorney Fees

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Crystal Industries Ltd

Appellant

Kamanzi Charles

Appellant

Mbabazi Enid

Appellant

Banque Populaire du Rwanda Plc (BPR Plc)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Commercial Appeal / Second Appeal (court of Appeal)

  1. 1 Whether the second appeal is admissible where the appellants lost in both lower courts on the same grounds
  2. 2 Whether the appellants and sureties were liable for the loan amount and associated costs
  3. 3 Whether the costs and attorney fees claimed by the respondent are justified

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal found that both lower courts decided against the appellants on the same essential ground—failure to comply with the loan agreement—regardless of the number or nature of issues considered. Therefore, the second appeal is inadmissible under Article 52(3) of Law No 30/2018. The appellants and sureties remain jointly liable for the loan and associated costs. The respondent is entitled to partial costs and attorney fees due to the unnecessary appeal.

Court Disposition

Second appeal dismissed as inadmissible for lack of jurisdiction; costs awarded to respondent.

Orders

  • Appellants' second appeal is not admitted for lack of jurisdiction.
  • Crystal Industries Ltd, Kamanzi Charles, and Mbabazi Enid are jointly ordered to pay BPR Plc RWF 500,000 as attorney fees and RWF 200,000 as costs for this level.