UBUSHINJACYAHA vs MATESO

UBUSHINJACYAHA vs MATESO

The court found that Mateso Nepomuscène intentionally killed his wife using a machete to the face, which is a vital part of the body, and that his explanations of provocation or mistaken identity were not credible. The court held that the charge should be changed to intentional homicide, but the sentence could not...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RPAA 00331/2023/CA
Parties
Prosecution: Ubushinjacyaha; Defendant: Mateso Nepomuscène
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
14 February 2025
Case Number
RPAA 00331/2023/CA
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Murder, Change of Charge, Provocation, Sentencing, Appeal Procedure
Source Language
rw
Criminal Law Murder Change of Charge Provocation Sentencing Appeal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ubushinjacyaha

Prosecution

Mateso Nepomuscène

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the charge against Mateso Nepomuscène should be changed to intentional homicide
  2. 2 Whether Mateso Nepomuscène committed the offence under provocation

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that Mateso Nepomuscène intentionally killed his wife using a machete to the face, which is a vital part of the body, and that his explanations of provocation or mistaken identity were not credible. The court held that the charge should be changed to intentional homicide, but the sentence could not be increased beyond 15 years since only the accused appealed.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal of Mateso Nepomuscène is dismissed.
  • The conviction is changed to intentional homicide.