Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Rwanda decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Court of Appeal found that Uwineza Jeanne was a first-time offender, admitted guilt from the outset, and that comparable cases had resulted in lower sentences. Therefore, the sentence should be reduced from 25 to 20 years' imprisonment.
Source excerpt
Urukiko rw’Ubujurire rwemeje ko Harerimana Protogène adagabanyirizwa igifungo cya burundu, rusanga uburyo yakoze icyaha bugaragaza ubugome bukabije.
Urukiko rw’Ubujurire rwemeje ko Habiyakare atagabanyirizwa igihano yongeye, rusanga igifungo cy’imyaka 20 cyari gihagije ku cyaha yakoze.
The Court of Appeal dismissed Ishimwe Seth’s appeal, upheld his murder conviction, and maintained his 25-year sentence, relying on corroborated witness evidence and flight.
The appellant's admission of guilt was already considered by the High Court in reducing the sentence from life imprisonment to 25 years. No credible evidence of provocation was presented, and the issue was not raised at trial, making it inadmissible on appeal. The High Court did not err in its sentencing discretion, and no further mitigation was warranted.
Source excerpt
Micomyiza Christophe's admission of guilt was considered and resulted in mitigation from life imprisonment to 25 years. No credible evidence of provocation was presented at trial, and new grounds raised on appeal regarding provocation cannot be considered. The sentence imposed by the High Court was appropriate given the brutality of the crime and the circumstances.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal upheld a 15-year murder sentence, holding that the appellant’s confession was not timely and he had already received the statutory minimum.
The Court of Appeal held that mitigating circumstances did not require sentence reduction, and upheld Bizimungu Kanyamibare’s life sentence for murder.
The defendant is not entitled to further reduction of sentence because he did not unequivocally admit guilt, having claimed provocation without evidence, and committed the crime with excessive cruelty.
Source excerpt
The appellate court found that the lower court erred by failing to properly assess evidence of provocation and exculpatory witness statements. It held that the defendant acted under provocation, which legally reduces the sentence for murder from 25 years to 5 years imprisonment under the relevant statute.
Source excerpt
Explore more
