MURORUNKWERE vs RWAGASANA

MURORUNKWERE vs RWAGASANA

The Court of Appeal found that both the Intermediate Court and the High Court decided the same essential issue—whether Rwagasana John and Murorunkwere Jeanne should equally divide property acquired during their cohabitation—and both ruled against Murorunkwere Jeanne on this point. Therefore, under Article 52(3) of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
RCAA 00012/2024/CA
Parties
Applicant: Murorunkwere Jeanne; Respondent: Rwagasana John
Court
Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
Rwanda
Judgment Date
14 February 2025
Case Number
RCAA 00012/2024/CA
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Determination of Admissibility of Second Appeal
Outcome
Second appeal dismissed as inadmissible; costs awarded to respondent.
Legal Topics
Division of Property, Cohabitation, Child Custody, Child Maintenance, Admissibility of Second Appeal, Costs
Source Language
rw
Family Law Civil Procedure Division of Property Cohabitation Child Custody Child Maintenance Admissibility of Second Appeal Costs

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Murorunkwere Jeanne

Applicant

Rwagasana John

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Determination of Admissibility of Second Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the second appeal by Murorunkwere Jeanne is admissible given prior defeats on the same grounds in lower courts
  2. 2 Whether the lower courts decided the same core issue regarding division of property acquired during cohabitation
  3. 3 Entitlement to costs and legal fees

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal found that both the Intermediate Court and the High Court decided the same essential issue—whether Rwagasana John and Murorunkwere Jeanne should equally divide property acquired during their cohabitation—and both ruled against Murorunkwere Jeanne on this point. Therefore, under Article 52(3) of Law No. 30/2018, her second appeal was inadmissible.

Court Disposition

Second appeal dismissed as inadmissible; costs awarded to respondent.

Orders

  • Murorunkwere Jeanne to pay Rwagasana John 200,000 Frw for case costs and 500,000 Frw for advocate's fees.
  • The appeal bond posted by Murorunkwere Jeanne is deemed to cover the procedural costs incurred.