Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Rwanda decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Urukiko rw’Ubujurire rwemeje ko CRBC Ltd itubahirije amasezerano yo gusuka itaka, rugenera DE HAGUENAU indishyi z’inyongera, rubihakana ku bindi byasabwe.
Urukiko rw'Ubujurire rwemeje ko CLAY'S FACTORY Ltd igomba gusubiza 132,750 USD, ruvanaho inyungu za 43,879.95 USD, kandi rwerekana ko ubujurire bwuririye ku bundi ku nyungu butakirwa.
The Court of Appeal allowed Urugaga rw’Abavoka to withdraw its appeal without the respondent’s consent and awarded Mhayimana Isaïe legal fees and costs.
The Court of Appeal held that Murorunkwere Jeanne’s second appeal was inadmissible because she had lost in the lower courts on the same core issue.
The Court of Appeal lacks jurisdiction to hear Dr Bwimba's second appeal because he lost in both lower courts on the same grounds. Kabanda's appeal is dismissed for lack of specific grounds. Costs are awarded against Dr Bwimba in favor of the District.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal dismissed Barawumfitiye Vestine’s appeal as inadmissible, holding it was a second appeal barred by statute after two lower courts ruled on the same grounds.
The Court of Appeal allowed Nyiringango Anastase to withdraw his suit after Jali Transport Ltd consented, leaving the prior High Court judgment in force.
The appellant failed to demonstrate any real urgency or irreparable harm that would result from execution of the judgment before the review application was determined. His concerns about undervaluation and inability to recover property are speculative and do not meet the legal threshold for urgent relief. The High Commercial Court did not err in dismissing the urgent application. The bailiff, having been unnecessarily joined, is entitled to partial costs and advocate's fees.
Source excerpt
The urgent application by Life Goal Company Ltd was inadmissible because it was not the party who initiated the main suit in the High Commercial Court. Only the party who filed the main suit has standing to bring an urgent application. Consequently, the High Commercial Court's decision was set aside, and Life Goal Company Ltd was ordered to pay costs and attorney fees to Niyonsaba Edouard.
Source excerpt
The High Court rejected Kwihangana Eudi’s application to review an earlier judgment, holding that the SAIC Ltd report was not new evidence under the law.
Explore more
