Sign in
Rwanda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Rwanda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Rwanda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Administrative law RADAA00014/2024/CA

UMUJYI WA KIGALI v. MUTANGIZA N’ABANDI

The Court of Appeal allowed the City of Kigali to withdraw its appeal, holding that consent of the other parties was not required and awarding appellate costs.

  • Withdrawal of appeal
  • Compensation for expropriation
  • Costs and attorney fees
  • Public interest expropriation
  • Withdrawal-of-appeal
  • Appellate-costs
Read case analysis
Administrative law RADAA 00023/2024/CA

UMUJYI WA KIGALI v. BAYINGANA

The Court of Appeal held that the second appeal was inadmissible because the applicant lost in both lower courts on the same grounds, and awarded costs to Bayingana.

  • Compensation for expropriation
  • Jurisdiction of appellate courts
  • Standing to sue
  • Public interest expropriation
  • Legal status of property in wetlands
  • Jurisdiction-of-appellate-courts
Read case analysis
Administrative law RADAA 00003/2023/CA

LETA Y’U RWANDA (MINADEF) vs. ALPHA PALACE Ltd

The Court of Appeal held that fair compensation in expropriation cases must be based on the market value of the property at the time of compensation, as determined by a balanced assessment of all expert reports. The court found no error in the High Court's reliance on the respondent's valuation for the land and MINADEF's valuation for the building, and upheld the award of costs and legal fees due to MINADEF's conduct and the lack of merit in its appeal.

  • Compensation for expropriation
  • Valuation of expropriated property
  • Public interest expropriation
  • Procedural fairness in compensation
  • Costs and legal fees
Read case analysis
Administrative law RADAA 00003/2023/CA

LETA Y’U RWANDA (MINADEF) vs. ALPHA PALACE Ltd

The Court of Appeal held that fair compensation in public interest expropriation must be based on the market value as determined by a balanced assessment of all expert reports, giving weight to the court-appointed experts’ report when neither party successfully challenges it. The government’s appeal was dismissed as it failed to show that the lower court erred in its valuation or in awarding costs and expert fees.

  • Compensation for expropriation
  • Valuation of expropriated property
  • Public interest expropriation
  • Court-appointed experts
  • Costs and legal fees
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Rwanda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.