Sign in
Rwanda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Rwanda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Rwanda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Commercial law RCOMAA 00053/2024/CA

ENTREPRISE D’ADDUCTION D’EAU ET DE CONSTRUCTION v AKARERE KA GATSIBO

EADECO failed to complete the contracted works within the agreed period, with only 34% of the works completed by the contractual deadline and 50% after additional time. The delays were attributable to EADECO, not to the respondent's conduct. The evidence provided by EADECO for compensation claims was insufficient and not independently verified. The contract and law entitled Akarere ka Gatsibo to terminate the contract for delay. Therefore, the appeal lacked merit and was dismissed.

  • Breach of contract
  • Termination of contract
  • Public procurement contracts
  • Damages and compensation
  • Procedural law
Read case analysis
Commercial law RCOMAA 00090/2024/CA

SINDAYIGAYA v. UMURYANGO APE RUGUNGA

The Court of Appeal held that a second appeal was inadmissible because the impugned materials were public documents, not new evidence requiring reopening of hearings.

  • Termination of contract
  • Public documents as evidence
  • Appellate jurisdiction
  • Costs and legal fees
  • Appellate-jurisdiction
  • Public-documents-as-evidence
Read case analysis
Contract law RCOMA 00054- 00056/2022/CA

AKARERE KA NYARUGURU N ’UNDI v. BES & SUPPLY Ltd N’ ABANDI

The Court of Appeal held that Nyaruguru District unlawfully terminated a construction contract, reduced and adjusted payment awards, returned the surety, and allocated expert fees and costs.

  • Termination of contract
  • Performance of contract
  • Damages
  • Surety/bond recovery
  • Third-party intervention
  • Expert fees
Read case analysis
Public procurement RCOMAA 00026/2018/CA

RADIANT_INSURANCE_COMPANY_LTD_v_RWANDA_AGRICULTURE_BOARD

The Court of Appeal held that an advance payment guarantee remains valid until the advance is fully refunded, even if the completed works exceed the advance.

  • Advance payment guarantee
  • Refund of advance payment
  • Obligations of insurer
  • Termination of contract
  • Damages
  • Security for advance payment
Read case analysis
Public procurement RLR V.3-2021

RADIANT INSURANCE COMPANY LTD v RWANDA AGRICULTURE BOARD

The Court of Appeal held that an advance payment guarantee remained payable until the advance was fully refunded, even if the works completed exceeded the advance.

  • Advance payment guarantee
  • Refund of advance payment
  • Obligations of insurer
  • Termination of contract
  • Damages
  • Court fees
Read case analysis
Contract law RCOMAA 0006/14/CS

MINOR METALS MINING COMPANY Ltd (MMMC Ltd) v. MUPENZI

The Supreme Court found MMMC Ltd had not proved Mupenzi breached the contract, upheld Mupenzi’s partial appeal, and ordered compensation and court costs.

  • Breach of contract
  • Damages
  • Royalties
  • Burden of proof
  • Termination of contract
  • Breach-of-contract
Read case analysis
Contract law RCOMA 0141/12/CS&RCOMA 0142/12/CS

MAKUZA N’ABANDI v. NEW BUGARAMA MINING COMPANY Ltd

The Supreme Court held that NBMC had to pay commission only for production earned before the applicants stopped working, and it terminated the contract.

  • Breach of contract
  • Damages for non-performance
  • Interpretation of written evidence
  • Termination of contract
  • Interest on delayed payments
  • Breach-of-contract
Read case analysis
Commercial law RCOMA OO24/13/CS

KAYIGAMBA v. AKAGERA BUSINESS GROUP Ltd

The Supreme Court held that the vehicle contract was a leasing agreement, not a credit sale, and that the employer unlawfully terminated it.

  • Leasing contracts
  • Termination of contract
  • Damages for breach of contract
  • Ownership transfer
  • Employment termination
  • Leasing-contracts
Read case analysis
Administrative law RADA0051/11/CS

EMUGECO v. UMUJYI WA KIGALI

The Supreme Court held that EMUGECO had no basis to claim payment for unused materials after contract termination, and it did not admit the respondent's incidental appeal.

  • Breach of contract
  • Damages
  • Termination of contract
  • Procedural law
  • Contract-termination
  • Administrative-contracts
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Rwanda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.