Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Rwanda decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The appellate court found that the lower court erred by failing to properly assess evidence of provocation and exculpatory witness statements. It held that the defendant acted under provocation, which legally reduces the sentence for murder from 25 years to 5 years imprisonment under the relevant statute.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal dismissed Mutuyeyezu Valens’s request for provisional release pending appeal, holding that he showed no serious and exceptional grounds.
The Court of Appeal upheld life sentences for three accused in a murder and assault case, holding that witness and co-accused evidence supported their joint participation.
The Court of Appeal held that convicting Iyamuremye Jean Claude for attacks at Gatarasi Thaddée and DCA, which were not specified in the indictment, violated his right to be informed of the charges. However, the conviction for genocide based on his participation in the Kicukiro Health Center and Nyanza attacks was upheld, as the evidence from key witnesses was found credible despite minor inconsistencies, and the specific intent for genocide was established. The sentence was reduced to 20 years, considering his youth at the time, his non-leadership role, and some mitigating acts.
Source excerpt
The Court of Appeal overturned an acquittal, rejected the alibi, and convicted Twagirayezu of genocide and extermination as a crime against humanity.
The Court of Appeal dismissed Musonera André’s appeal, upholding his conviction for assault causing death and finding no error in witness assessment or refusal to call defense witnesses.
The court held that the victim's testimony was credible, corroborated by other witnesses and documentary evidence, and that minor discrepancies among witnesses did not create reasonable doubt. The court found Nzamwita Anaclet guilty of intentional assault and battery and imposed a sentence within the statutory range.
Source excerpt
Trial Chamber II in the Bizimungu et al. case addressed disclosure, notice, counsel, delay, alibi, witness credibility, and several genocide-related allegations.
Explore more
