Sign in
Rwanda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Rwanda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Rwanda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Tort law RS/INJUST/RC 00011/2024/SC

GAMECO Ltd vs MUKABIDERI

The Supreme Court dismissed GAMECO Ltd’s review application and upheld liability for compensation to Mukabideri Cécile arising from a workplace-related accident.

  • Vicarious liability
  • Compensation for injury
  • Subcontracting liability
  • Enforcement of contractual obligations
  • Vicarious-liability
  • Subcontracting-liability
Read case analysis
Tort law RCA 00324/2022/HC/KIG

MUSENGIMANA v EUCL

The High Court held that, since there is no specific law governing damages for injuries caused by electricity accidents, damages must be determined by judicial discretion based on general principles of liability for harm caused by things under one's control. The court rejected the direct application of the presidential decree for motor vehicle accidents but used its methodology as guidance. The applicant was awarded damages reflecting his 92% permanent disability, loss of earning capacity, and related expenses, as the evidence established EUCL's liability.

  • Compensation for injury
  • Electricity accidents
  • Damages calculation
  • Permanent disability
  • Analogical interpretation
  • Burden of proof
Read case analysis
Insurance law RS/INJUST/RC 00019/2022/SC

MUSENGAMANA v SGF

The Supreme Court held that the claimant failed to prove the uninsured vehicle caused the accident, so SGF was not liable to pay compensation.

  • Motor vehicle accident liability
  • Compensation for injury
  • Burden of proof
  • Direct action against insurer
  • Motor-vehicle-accident-liability
  • Insurance-law
Read case analysis
Insurance law RS/INJUST/RC 00004/2023/CA

MURINDAHABI v SANLAM AG Plc

The accident did not occur during the applicant's regular commute from work to his stable residence, nor was it during working hours or under employer instructions. The applicant was not authorized to use the company vehicle for personal travel to Kigali. Therefore, the accident is classified as an ordinary road accident, not a workplace accident, making the insurer (SANLAM AG Plc) liable for compensation. The applicant is entitled to the compensation previously awarded by the lower court, plus litigation costs and attorney fees.

  • Motor vehicle accident
  • Workplace accident distinction
  • Compensation for injury
  • Insurance liability
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Rwanda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.