UWIMANA vs. NGIRUWONSANGA N’ABANDI
The Court found that the land was lawfully sold by the deceased husband in accordance with the law applicable at the time, which vested management and disposal authority in the husband as head of household. The absence of written contracts did not invalidate the sales, as oral agreements and witness testimony were sufficient under then-prevailing law. The applicant failed to prove any miscarriage of justice or legal error in the prior decisions. The costs and damages previously awarded against her were justified due to her unsuccessful and unfounded litigation.
Source excerpt
- Matrimonial property
- Land ownership
- Burden of proof
- Gender equality
- Appeal procedure
- Costs and damages