Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Rwanda decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Court of Appeal partly granted review for injustice, reducing the amounts payable for maize and bean seeds and declining legal costs and attorney fees.
The Court of Appeal held that Dushimimana Blaise proved a traceable title to the disputed land parcel, while Ufitingabire Béatrice did not link her claim to the specific parcel.
The Supreme Court found that the respondents failed to prove Munyengabe's ownership of the land beyond the contested certificate, while the applicant demonstrated the land's origin from Dusabemungu Barthélémy through prior judgments and witness testimony. The certificate held by the respondents was annulled as it was not obtained in accordance with the law, and the land was ordered to be registered in the applicant's name.
Source excerpt
The Supreme Court found Niyonagize Augustave was unlawfully dismissed by Koperative Duhuzumurimo wa Karoti and awarded compensation, unpaid salary, notice pay, and costs.
Semapondo Charles failed to provide sufficient evidence that the payment he made to Koperative Goboka in 2007 was for the specific plot 1418 in dispute. The documentary and testimonial evidence did not establish a direct link to the disputed plot, whereas Rwasimpenzi Wellars presented clear, official documents and registration proving ownership. Therefore, there was no injustice in the prior Court of Appeal decision, and the application for retrial was dismissed.
Source excerpt
The Commercial High Court dismissed MUGABE Thomas’s appeal, holding that he could be personally liable for contracts signed and performed under his business name.
The Commercial High Court held that a Frw 18,000,000 line of credit was disbursed and included in the debt, upheld liability, and ordered joint payment with the guarantor.
The Commercial High Court dismissed Mungu Akonkwa’s appeal, upheld the loan repayment schedule, rejected his claim to interest on the guaranty, and confirmed costs against him.
The Commercial High Court dismissed Ngwinondebe’s appeal against SONARWA, finding no proof that she was forced to use a garage or that the chassis was not new.
The court upheld the importer’s declared customs value and dismissed RRA’s appeal, holding that the agency lacked sufficient evidence to override the USD 4,300 transaction value.
Explore more
