Sign in
Rwanda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Rwanda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Rwanda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil procedure RADA00006/2024/CA

URUGAGA RW’ABAVOKA v. MHAYIMANA

The Court of Appeal allowed Urugaga rw’Abavoka to withdraw its appeal without the respondent’s consent and awarded Mhayimana Isaïe legal fees and costs.

  • Withdrawal of suit
  • Costs
  • Disciplinary proceedings
  • Legal representation
  • Withdrawal-of-appeal
  • Legal-fees
Read case analysis
Criminal law RPA/GEN 00006/2019/CA

UBUSHINJACYAHA v MBARUSHIMANA

The court held that the defendant was provided legal representation in accordance with the law, was not tried twice for the same offence as the Gacaca judgment was set aside before trial, and that prosecution for international crimes was lawful under both international and domestic law, regardless of the date of enactment. The court found the evidence, including testimony from convicted persons and hearsay, was lawfully admitted and corroborated. Convictions for both genocide and conspiracy to commit genocide, and for genocide and extermination as crimes against humanity, were upheld as the o…

  • Genocide
  • Crimes against humanity
  • Extradition
  • Right to fair trial
  • Evidence law
  • Non bis in idem
Read case analysis
Civil procedure RC 00002/2024/SC

TUYISHIME v TWAGIRAMUNGU N’ABANDI

The Supreme Court held that Tuyishime Samuel lacked standing to challenge conflicting judgments over his late father’s property while the surviving spouse remained alive.

  • Locus standi
  • Succession rights
  • Matrimonial property
  • Conflicting judgments
  • Legal representation
  • Locus-standi
Read case analysis
Civil procedure RLR V.1 - 2015

SETRAPCO v. BARBARA A. STIEFEL FOUNDATION

The appeal by SETRAPCO Ltd was not admissible because it sued Barbara A. Stiefel Foundation represented by individuals (Penny Ensley and Stephen Rwamurangwa) who lacked legal authority to represent the Foundation in court. Only Barbara A. Stiefel had such authority. The lack of proper legal standing is a ground for non-receivability and can be raised at any stage, including by the court itself.

  • Standing of parties
  • Legal representation
  • Non-receivability of claims
  • Corporate litigation procedure
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Rwanda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.