Sign in
Rwanda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Rwanda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Rwanda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Banking law RLR V.2-2024

MUGWANEZA v. BANK OF KIGALI LTD

The Supreme Court held Bank of Kigali liable for an unauthorized USD 11,500 withdrawal, awarded interest equal to the principal, and rejected the 310,000 Frw claim.

  • Bank liability
  • Customer protection
  • Unauthorized withdrawal
  • Interest on arrears
  • Compensation for negligence
  • Bank-liability
Read case analysis
Banking law RLR V2 2024

MUGWANEZA v. BANK OF KIGALI LTD

The Supreme Court held that Bank of Kigali breached its duty of care by allowing an unauthorized USD withdrawal and ordered repayment, interest, and distress damages.

  • Bank's duty of care
  • Unauthorized withdrawal
  • Professional obligations of banks
  • Customer obligations
  • Damages for financial loss
  • Interest calculation
Read case analysis
Banking law RCOMA 00383/2016/CHC/HCC

Bank of Africa Rwanda Ltd v KARANGWA

The court held that the bank unlawfully withdrew funds from a customer’s account after the loan was fully repaid and ordered repayment plus attorney fees.

  • Unauthorized withdrawal
  • Bank liability
  • Damages
  • Attorney fees
  • Unauthorized-withdrawal
  • Bank-liability
Read case analysis
Banking law RCOMA 0129/12/CS

38 KAGARAGU V. BANKI Y’ABATURAGE Y’U RWANDA

The Supreme Court held that BPR had to refund 14,000,000 Frw withdrawn from Kagaragu’s account and 500,000 Frw uncredited, and awarded moral damages and costs.

  • Unauthorized withdrawal
  • Burden of proof
  • Damages for distress
  • Procedural requirements for evidence
  • Bank's fiduciary duty
  • Banking-law
Read case analysis
Banking law RCOMA 0129/12/CS

KAGARAGU V. BANQUE POPULARE DU RWANDA

BPR failed to justify the withdrawal and use of 14,000,000 Frw from Kagaragu's account and did not rebut evidence of the 500,000 Frw deposit; thus, BPR must refund these amounts. Economic damages were denied for lack of computation, but moral damages and procedural/advocate fees were awarded as Kagaragu suffered prejudice and prevailed in the case.

  • Unauthorized withdrawal
  • Burden of proof
  • Damages
  • Evidence
  • Banking procedure
Read case analysis
Banking law RCOMA 0129/12/CS

KAGARAGU V. BANQUE POPULARE DU RWANDA

BPR failed to justify the withdrawal of 14,000,000 Frw from Kagaragu's account and did not prove it acted on his authorization or in his interest. The bank also failed to rebut evidence of the 500,000 Frw deposit. Economic damages were denied for lack of computation detail, but moral damages and procedural fees were awarded due to prejudice and litigation expenses caused by BPR's mismanagement.

  • Unauthorized withdrawal
  • Burden of proof
  • Damages
  • Evidence
  • Bank-client relationship
Read case analysis
Commercial law RCOMA 0113/11/CS

2Ecobank v Ituze (english)

The appeal was not out of time because there was no evidence Ecobank was notified of the judgment pronouncement date. The contract was not enforceable as Ituze Ltd did not sign it, so Ecobank had no right to withdraw funds. Ecobank must restore the account to its prior status by depositing 11,400,000 Rwf. Damages awarded by the lower court were not supported by evidence and are overturned.

  • Loan agreements
  • Contract validity
  • Unauthorized withdrawal
  • Damages
  • Appeal admissibility
Read case analysis

About this LexChat collection

Rwanda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.