Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Rwanda decisions
Decisions matching the current search
The Court of Appeal held that Nkurunziza Frank’s second appeal was outside its jurisdiction because the subject matter value did not meet the statutory threshold.
The Court of Appeal held it lacked jurisdiction over a second appeal because the subject matter value was 60,000,000 Frw, below the statutory threshold.
The Supreme Court held that appellate jurisdiction depends on the value in the original pleadings, not a later mortgage registration valuation, and dismissed the appeal.
The Supreme Court held it lacked jurisdiction because the claim value was 4,500,000 Frw, below the threshold; a later mortgage valuation could not be used.
The Supreme Court held that jurisdiction depended on the plaint’s stated value, which was 40,000,000 Frw, so the objection to jurisdiction failed.
The Supreme Court held that the value of the subject matter was fixed by the claimant at 40,000,000 Frw, so the appeal fell within its jurisdiction.
Explore more
